|
Fire officials
in Minnesota are often questioned by the public as to the performance of
smoke detectors versus heat detectors when installed to provide early life
saving warning in the residential environment. State Fire Marshal Division
personnel also receive similar questions concerning the requirements for
smoke detectors in residential buildings as required by the 2003 Minnesota
State Fire Code.
Full-scale fire
tests conducted since the 1960’s have shown that smoke detectors are more
reliable than heat detectors for early warning to provide live safety in
homes. In the January/February 1993 NFPA Journal, Bukowski summarizes 10
independent studies comprising over 200 experiments that prove this point.
The following
text is extracted from State Fire Marshal Division Fact Sheet titled Fire
Alarms in Group R Division 3 Residential Buildings. Local fire officials
are encouraged to develop similar policies to provide guidance in dealing
with the issue of smoke and heat detectors in residential buildings.
SMOKE DETECTORS IN
RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES
Experience and full
scale testing has shown that typical residential fires produce detectable
quantities of smoke prior to detectable levels of heat in nearly all cases.
In addition, slowly developing, smoldering fires may produce incapacitating
and even lethal levels of smoke and toxic gases without any significant
increase in room temperature. The Minnesota State Fire Marshal acknowledges
that approved heat detectors installed in areas not appropriate for smoke
detector installation such as furnace rooms, garages and unfinished attics,
may provide some additional warning in the case of a fire confined to these
areas. The State Fire Marshal will not accept heat detectors as an
alternative or equal to smoke detectors in locations requiring the
installations of smoke detectors.
IONIZATION VERSUS
PHOTOELECTRIC DETECTORS
In cases where smoke
detectors are subject to frequent false alarming due to cooking, smoking or
similar causes, the State Fire Marshal encourages the installation of
photoelectric smoke detectors as they are not as susceptible to these types
of false activation.
Studies have shown
that ionization detectors are better at detecting small, invisible particles
of combustion that are typically present from fast, hot, flaming fires.
These studies have also shown that photoelectric detectors are better at
detecting larger, visible smoke particles that are more commonly seen from
slow, smoldering fires. Both types of smoke detectors have been shown to be
effective in detecting typical residential-type fires. Some research seems
to indicate that photoelectric detectors may activate slightly sooner as
many residential fires start out as slow, smoldering fires.
PRICES AND SALES
PRACTICES
In Checking with a
number of retail outlets, the following were typical prices:
|
Battery-powered (9
volt) smoke detector - ionization type |
$ 8.00 |
|
Hard-wired (120
volt) smoke detector - ionization type |
$10.00 |
|
Hard-wired smoke
detector with battery back-up - ionization type |
$20.00 |
|
Battery-powered (9
volt) smoke detector - photoelectric type |
$25.00 |
|
Hard-wired (120
volt) smoke detector - photoelectric type |
$25.00 |
|
Battery-powered (9
volt) smoke detector - dual sensor type ionization and photoelectric |
$30.00 |
|
Heat detector (where
appropriate, i.e. garage, furnace room) |
$30.00 |
There are companies
in Minnesota that market and sell detection devices and/or systems for
residences. These devices and/or systems can become relatively expensive
and will cause homeowners to question State Fire Marshal personnel as to
their value. As with any device, system, service or contractor, State Fire
Marshal personnel are not permitted to endorse or recommend particular
products or companies.
When questioned by
homeowners as to whether or not these types of systems or equipment were a
good value or fair price, State Fire Marshal personnel are advised not to
comment. Homeowners are recommended to obtain price quotes from a number of
different vendors before signing a contract for the installation of fire
detection or alarm systems.
If an individual is
concerned about questionable sales practices, the person should be advised
to contact the Better Business Bureau or the Consumer Services Unit of the
Attorney General's Office at (651) 296-3353.
Last Modified:October 20, 2011.For
additional information, contact Robert Dahm, Minnesota State Fire
Marshal Division, at
Robert.Dahm@state.mn.us or (651)215-0500.
Minnesota State Fire Marshal Division
444 Cedar St., Suite 145
St. Paul, MN 55101-5145
651-215-0500 – voice
651-215-0525 – fax
651-282-6555 - TDD
|